The 27th McDonald Institute Lecture

Duration: 58 mins 29 secs

Share this media item:

Embed this media item:

<iframe width="_width_" height="_height_" src="https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2135998/embed" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Choose size:

About this item

Available Formats

About this item

The 27th McDonald Institute Lecture's image

Description:	Counternarratives of Early States in Mesopotamia (and Elsewhere). Professor Norman Yoffee

Created:

2015-12-14 08:21

Collection:

McDonald Institute
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Publisher:

University of Cambridge

McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Language:

eng (English)

Distribution:

World

(not downloadable)

Keywords:

McDonald Annual Lecture; Norman Yoffee; Early Mesopotamia; Archaeology;

Credits:

Photographer:	Howard France of Avito Ltd
Editor:	Howard France of Avito Ltd

Categories:

iTunes - Psychology & Social Science - Archaeology

Explicit content:

Aspect Ratio:

4:3

Screencast:

Bumper:

UCS Default

Trailer:

UCS Default


Abstract:	A master narrative tends to regard the Crown in Mesopotamia as all-powerful, led by kings (and their bureaucracies) who controlled the flow of goods, services, and information. The most successful kings brought together fractious cities, disparate trouble-making groups - “ethnic” or “tribal” groups - and the unruly countryside. The mightiest of these kings constructed a territorial state and expanded this to an empire. In recent years, however, scholars are asking new questions about this narrative: In what ways were people subjects of the Crown? Why were cities fractious? How were ethnic groups in the countryside able to make trouble? Why did these states collapse? Dispatches about research in a variety of other early states show similar patterns of unhappiness with received narratives. Also, modern archaeologists are turning from certain disco-age preoccupations of defining an essentialized ancient state and identifying it in the archaeological record to concerns about what the state does. Even newer research is concerned with what the state does not do. This lecture considers whether an emergent counternarrative about ancient cities and states is setting the agenda for new research on ancient states globally.

Abstract:

A master narrative tends to regard the Crown in Mesopotamia as all-powerful, led by kings (and their bureaucracies) who controlled the flow of goods, services, and information. The most successful kings brought together fractious cities, disparate trouble-making groups - “ethnic” or “tribal” groups - and the unruly countryside. The mightiest of these kings constructed a territorial state and expanded this to an empire. In recent years, however, scholars are asking new questions about this narrative: In what ways were people subjects of the Crown? Why were cities fractious? How were ethnic groups in the countryside able to make trouble? Why did these states collapse?

Dispatches about research in a variety of other early states show similar patterns of unhappiness with received narratives. Also, modern archaeologists are turning from certain disco-age preoccupations of defining an essentialized ancient state and identifying it in the archaeological record to concerns about what the state does. Even newer research is concerned with what the state does not do.

This lecture considers whether an emergent counternarrative about ancient cities and states is setting the agenda for new research on ancient states globally.

Available Formats

Format	Quality	Bitrate	Size
MPEG-4 Video	640x360	1.91 Mbits/sec	838.07 MB	View
WebM	640x360	1.48 Mbits/sec	651.28 MB	View
iPod Video	480x360	492.85 kbits/sec	211.11 MB	View
MP3	44100 Hz	249.75 kbits/sec	107.10 MB	Listen
Auto *	(Allows browser to choose a format it supports)

Streaming Media Service Upload

The 27th McDonald Institute Lecture