Darling, dukeling, duckling: how historical corpora can verify predicted pathways of language change

About this item
Image inherited from collection
Description: Talk by Dr Marieke Meelen, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow, Theoretical & Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge
 
Created: 2019-11-25 14:34
Collection: Language Sciences Annual Symposium 2019 - Perspectives on Language Change
Publisher: University of Cambridge
Copyright: Dr Marieke Meelen
Language: eng (English)
Distribution: World     (downloadable)
Keywords: historical linguistics; language variation and change; corpus linguistics; low-resource languages; data mining;
Credits:
Producer:  Mike Dowds (Cambridge Assessment)
Producer:  Dan Vickers (Cambridge Assessment)
Explicit content: No
Bumper: UCS Default
Trailer: UCS Default
 
Abstract: Over the years, scholars in formal semantic and morpho-syntactic frameworks have observed a number of ‘universal tendencies’ in language change. Jurafsky’s (1996) study of diminutives, for example, aims to predict the cross-linguistic origin and developments of words and suffixes that are linked to children such as ‘-ling’ in ‘duck-ling’, a baby duck. Recent work in comparative syntax goes one step further attempting to explain how cross-linguistic constraints on word-order variation are manifested and why that might lead to certain changes. These observations, however, are often based on a limited number of examples. In order to trace the exact history of predicted changes and verify postulated mechanisms of change, it is important to dive deeper and more rigorously into a large amount of historical data. In this talk I demonstrate why it is essential to build good historical corpora and how state-of-the-art methods of data mining can not only reveal a wealth of previously unknown linguistic features, they can also check predictions regarding cross-linguistic differences and similarities in semantics, morphology and syntax.